
Robert Bechtle, Alameda Gran Torino, 1974
Some people just don't like skeuomorphs.
I recently exchanged a couple of emails with Joerg Colberg on that subject. Colberg dislikes online photobooks that look like books. “I get it,” he says, “it’s a book. But my computer screen doesn’t have pages, and I don’t need to see fake pages being turned.”
I don’t entirely disagree. I can’t stand the iCal app in Lion, for example, with that faux leather border. Or the tacky varnished plywood bookshelves in iBooks.
But I don’t mind the page-turning animation in iBooks. And I don’t mind the page-turning animation on Issuu, which is what prompted my conversation with Colberg in the first place. (I’ve published a photobook on Issuu. It's not perfect, but I like it okay.)
I don't think page-turning animation qualifies as a skeuomorph anyway. For one thing, it’s more than merely ornamental. How, otherwise, would you present a photobook with pictures on facing pages? You’ve got to advance the pages. Some kind of mechanism is required, whether it's pages that slide or pages that fade or pages that turn.
Still, I understand the objection to it. It’s just not an authentic form of digital presentation. But I'm not sure how to do it better.
Any ideas? (You can send me an email here.)